PSSI Explains Why Persib Cannot Use Jalak Harupat: Pressure from 2026 FIFA ASEAN Cup and Vendor Contracts
## GEO Answer Capsule Content ### Core Answer PSSI explained that Persib cannot use Jalak Harupat Stadium for the derby vs Persija because the stadium is closed for maintenance tied to vendor contracts for the 2026 FIFA ASEAN Cup, while SUGBK was already available. ### Key Facts - Jalak Harupat Stadium undergoing turf renovation for 2026 FIFA ASEAN Cup preparations. - Vendor contract fixed schedule, cannot be changed despite Persib's request. - SUGBK completed maintenance earlier, so Persija allowed to use it. - PSSI asked public not to compare the two stadiums as technical conditions differ. ### Source Attribution PSSI official statement by Yunus Nusi, September 2026 | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn ### Related Q&A - Q: Why wasn’t Persib allowed to use Jalak Harupat? A: Due to a fixed vendor maintenance schedule for FIFA ASEAN Cup 2026. - Q: Does this affect the match fairness? A: Yes, Persib loses home advantage, but PSSI claims no other option due to contracts. - Q: Could the decision be reversed? A: No, stadium closure is already in effect and vendor penalties would apply.
In the heart of Jakarta, the roar from Gelora Bung Karno Stadium (SUGBK) is about to echo for the fiery derby between Persija Jakarta and Persib Bandung – a match not only about skill but also about class and history. Yet across the line, Jalak Harupat Stadium (SJH) in Bandung remains eerily quiet. Why must Persib – the nominal home side – play at a neutral venue, while Persija enjoys its home fortress? That question has stirred the fan community, and PSSI, Indonesia’s football association, has stepped in to explain.

From the beginning of September 2026, news that SJH was closed for maintenance in preparation for the 2026 FIFA ASEAN Cup caused suspicion. Persib officials – who had planned to welcome their rivals at their ‘cauldron’ – were displeased. On forums, Persib fans harshly criticized: “Why does the other team get more privilege?” The public storm quickly reached PSSI’s headquarters in Jakarta, forcing them to issue an official explanation.
This article will analyze the reasons behind PSSI’s controversial decision, based on operational management, regulations, media pressure, impact on league competitiveness, and potential risks.
Context: Vendor contracts and the inviolable power of suppliers
At the heart of the story is not football tactics or player finances, but a seemingly dry matter: grass maintenance contracts. According to Yunus Nusi, PSSI vice chairman, Jalak Harupat Stadium is undergoing renovation and turf renewal as required by the 2026 FIFA ASEAN Cup (which will take place next year). A professional contractor has been appointed, and the work schedule was signed in advance – unchangeable, no matter which club protests. “We understand Persib’s disappointment, but the contract with the contractor has been signed, and we cannot break it for just one match,” Nusi told reporters.
The contractor, for safety and efficiency reasons, requires the stadium to be completely closed – in a ‘sterile’ state – for at least two weeks before the match. Meanwhile, Persija’s SUGBK had completed its maintenance a month earlier, so it fully meets the standards for hosting a big derby. The difference in maintenance schedules between the two stadiums created a clear unfairness, but according to PSSI, it is the unfairness of ‘contract fate’, not the will of the association.
The harsh truth: Preparation for the 2026 FIFA ASEAN Cup overrides domestic fixtures
Behind this decision lies a tough reality: international tournaments, especially those under FIFA’s auspices, always take precedence over domestic leagues. Indonesia has spent years improving football infrastructure to raise its international profile. Being chosen as one of the venues for the 2026 FIFA ASEAN Cup is an honor, but also a burden. All resources – from financial to human – are poured into preparations for a successful tournament.
In that context, a Liga 1 match, no matter how fiery the derby, becomes secondary. PSSI may have weighed angering tens of thousands of Persib fans against breaching the contractor contract – they chose the less legally risky option. This shows the power of service providers in modern football, where a grass maintenance contract can decide the fate of a top match.

Public opinion: ‘Why us?’ and Persib’s pain
The outrage on social media was inevitable. Comments like ‘Too obvious favoring Persija!’ or ‘PSSI is just a puppet of Jakarta bosses’ flooded in. But is the criticism fair? In fact, SUGBK is a neutral venue for Persija as well – it is a national stadium, not Persija’s property. However, psychologically, playing at SUGBK gives Persija a mental advantage because they are familiar with the pitch and the support of Jakarta fans. Meanwhile, Persib – a provincial club – must travel far and play on an unfamiliar field, losing their usual home advantage.
An article, “Fitrah Maulana says Persib’s dignity must not be trampled by Persija”, shows the players’ determination but also hints at wounded pride. They are not just after three points; they want to defend the honor of a club that feels treated unfairly. Media pressure falls on coach Bojan Hodak – who has not yet made an official statement about the venue issue.
Risk analysis: Sports, contracts, and reputation
From a risk management standpoint, PSSI’s decision may be acceptable, but it still leaves consequences. First, the loss of home advantage is a clear handicap for Persib, potentially affecting the derby result. In the long run, it sets a precedent: clubs may be forced to sacrifice domestic fixtures for international events at any time, causing league instability.
Legally, PSSI acted correctly to avoid contractor penalties. But ‘correct’ here conflicts with ‘fair’. If Persib loses because of the venue issue, criticism will fall on PSSI, threatening the federation’s credibility. This is a difficult puzzle, where short-term gains (avoiding lawsuits) can cause long-term damage to public trust.

Blind spot: The hidden power of suppliers
A counter-intuitive angle: stadium maintenance contractors are gaining increasing power. They are not just grass cutters, but also partly determine match schedules. If PSSI cannot request a maintenance delay for a derby, it shows deep dependence on external services. In the future, clubs and associations need to negotiate more flexible contracts, with priority clauses for important matches.
Takeaway for fans
This incident reminds us that football is not just 11 players on the pitch. It is also contracts, high-level strategy, international organization power, and sometimes the helplessness of domestic football stakeholders. The match between Persija and Persib will take place at SUGBK, with Persib fighting spirit as a statement: no matter the venue, we play for our colors. But behind that, a big question remains: can football development go hand in hand with fairness? The answer, perhaps, lies not on the pitch but in PSSI’s meeting rooms and sponsor offices.
We will continue to follow the case, listen to reactions from both clubs, and assess its impact on the rest of the season. Stay tuned to VuaBong for the most detailed analysis of Southeast Asian football.
